THE POLICY EDGE
Reports/Data Releases

9 October 2026

MoSPI Proposes Tracking What Drives State GDP: Spending, Investment and Trade

Draft guidelines set out how States could measure household consumption, government spending and investmentalongside their existing production-based GDP estimates. A complete expenditure-side measure remains out of reach for now because State-level imports, exports and services-trade data are insufficient

Listen to the article
Reports/Data Releases image

Key Details

MoSPI’s Draft Guideline for Compilation of Gross State Domestic Product Estimates by Expenditure Approach provides a common method for estimating the components of spending, using the 2022–23 national accounts series.

Component

Proposed State-Level Method

Private consumption

Use household expenditure surveys alongside production and administrative data; allocate relevant national estimates using State-level indicators.

Government consumption

Draw on State budgets and allocate Central spending using location-wise Public Financial Management System data.

Capital formation

Combine budgets, enterprise accounts and surveys to estimate fixed investment, changes in inventories and valuables. Use indirect allocation methods where State data are absent.

Trade

Use available goods-flow information, but defer compilation of State-level imports and exports of goods and services until adequate data are available.


A Demand-Side View Would Complement Existing State GDP Figures

States currently estimate Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) mainly from the value added by different industries, with an adjustment for taxes and subsidies on products. The expenditure approach asks a different question: how much final spending is attributable to private consumption, government consumption and capital formation, after accounting for exports and imports.

That view could help distinguish, for example, a State economy supported primarily by household demand from one seeing stronger investment. It could also provide a cross-check on production-based estimates—but only when all major expenditure components can be measured.

Consumption and Investment Require a Mix of Direct Data and Allocation

For private consumption, the draft draws on the Household Consumption Expenditure Survey, but also uses administrative records, production figures and commodity-flow methods for items the survey cannot measure adequately on its own. State indicators —including population, electricity use and vehicle registrations — help distribute relevant national estimates.

Investment is more unevenly documented. Manufacturing can draw on the Annual Survey of Industries, while surveys and accounts supply information for other enterprises and the public sector. Where direct State-level private investment data are missing, the draft proposes using a national industry capital-to-output ratio with State value added to derive allocation shares. This is an interim estimate, not a direct observation of what firms invested in each State; it may miss differences in technology, scale and capital intensity.

The Missing Trade Component Prevents a Complete Measure

Expenditure-side GSDP must account for goods and services moving into and out of a State, including trade with other Indian States and other countries. Some goods-flow data exist, including international goods exports and selected inter-State movements. State-level international goods imports are unavailable, while comparable data on international and inter-State services trade are also lacking.

The draft therefore defers compilation of State-level imports and exports of goods and services. Its immediate contribution is a more consistent route to spending-component estimates, rather than a finished alternative GSDP series.


What Is Expenditure-Side GSDP?

It measures an economy through final spending: private consumption, government consumption and capital formation, plus exports minus imports. Imports must be deducted because spending on goods or services produced elsewhere does not represent production within the State.


Policy Relevance

  • For State planning: Comparable consumption and investment estimates could show more clearly where demand is concentrated, even before a complete expenditure-side GSDP is possible.

  • For statistical quality: Results built from State records or surveys should remain distinguishable from figures allocated from national totals. Both can be useful, but they carry different levels of State-specific evidence.

  • For the next stage: Better measurement of inter-State and international trade —especially services — is the decisive data requirement for a full demand-side cross-check of State GDP.


Follow the Full Draft Guideline Here: MoSPI’s Draft Guideline for Compilation of GSDP Estimates by Expenditure Approach

Rethinking Public Policy Through Insight | Inquiry | Impact

Opinion • Grassroots Voices • Policymakers Perspectives • Expert Analysis • Policy Briefs