SDG 16: Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions | SDG 17: Partnerships for the Goals | SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth
Ministry of Commerce and Industry | Invest India
The APEC Policy Support Unit (2026) report focuses on a critical yet under-utilized tool in international trade: Dispute Prevention and Mitigation (DPM) systems. These mechanisms are designed to address foreign investor grievances at the administrative level before they escalate into costly and reputation-damaging international arbitration. By providing structured channels for communication, DPMs act as an early-warning system for regulatory friction.
The report identifies a spectrum of successful APEC models:
The Ombudsman Model: Exemplified by Korea’s Foreign Investment Ombudsman, which acts as a specialized, independent mediator to resolve administrative difficulties.
Inter-Agency Coordination: Chile’s Inter-ministerial Committee and Peru’s SICRECI provide centralized platforms to coordinate responses across different government departments, ensuring a unified state position.
Investor Preference: Research shows that while investors value “one-stop contact points,” their effectiveness depends entirely on their perceived independence and authority to influence government action.
Agreement-Based DPMs: Modern investment treaties are increasingly moving beyond just “Arbitration” to mandate “Mediation” or “Consultation” phases as a legal prerequisite.
What is the ‘SICRECI’ model in investor protection? It is a centralized system, pioneered by Peru, designed to manage and coordinate a state’s response to international investment disputes. Unlike a simple helpdesk, SICRECI acts as a “Legal Defense and Mitigation” hub that alerts relevant government agencies when a grievance is filed, ensuring they provide necessary documentation and participate in early-stage negotiations. This avoids “surprising” the state with a multi-million dollar arbitration claim and allows for settlement before legal costs spiral.
Policy Relevance
For India, which has seen several high-profile Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) cases, the APEC findings provide a roadmap for institutionalizing investor trust.
Strategic Impact for India:
Beyond ‘Invest India’: While India has a successful promotion agency, the report suggests a policy need for a specialized “Grievance Ombudsman” with the power to recommend binding administrative corrections.
Reducing Legal Liabilities: Adopting a SICRECI-style coordination body would allow the Indian government to respond more coherently to legal notices, potentially saving billions in contingent liabilities from arbitration awards.
Inclusive Growth: The report recommends extending these mechanisms to domestic investors, which would level the playing field and improve the overall “Ease of Doing Business” for Indian SMEs.
Treaty Modernization: As India negotiates new Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) with the UK and EU, including mandatory DPM clauses can shift the focus from litigation to long-term partnership.
Follow the full report here: APEC Dispute Prevention and Mitigation Research