ECB Research: Safe Asset Expansion Can Reduce Wealth Inequality and Raise Interest Rates
SDG 10: Reduced Inequalities | SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Reserve Bank of India (RBI) | Ministry of Finance | Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI)
This ECB Working Paper (No 3162) titled “Asset prices, wealth inequality, and welfare: safe assets as a solution” challenges the conventional view that the observed joint trends of rising asset prices, falling safe interest rates, and increasing top-wealth shares are inextricably linked11. The paper proposes a continuous-time general equilibrium model featuring two groups—Entrepreneurs (who hold risky private capital and are more patient) and Traditional Savers (who hold safer assets).
The central finding is that Safe Asset Expansions—achieved via financial innovation, Public Debt issuance, or stable equity bubbles—can cause asset prices to rise while simultaneously reducing wealth inequality.
Core Mechanism: The expansion of safety lowers the entrepreneurs’ undiversified risk exposure , which in turn compresses the risk premium they earn and raises the safe interest rate.
Redistributive Effect: This sequence slows the wealth accumulation rate of entrepreneurs relative to the less wealthy savers, effectively redistributing wealth and reducing inequality.
Welfare Implication: Savers benefit unambiguously from the higher safe interest rate. However, entrepreneurs’ welfare change is state-dependent: they gain only if they are already sufficiently wealthy; if they are poorer, they prefer a higher risk premium to grow faster, and thus lose from safety expansion.
What is the Safe Asset Redistribution Channel?→ The safe asset channel, driven by reducing entrepreneurs’ undiversified risk exposure , dampens their precautionary saving motive and reduces the excess return (risk premium) they earn on risky assets. This slows the inequality engine, leading to slower wealth concentration and a higher equilibrium safe rate10. In environments with an existing valuation bubble, a marginal increase in public debt is locally neutral as it is absorbed one-for-one by shrinking the bubble’s safe value11.
Policy Relevance
This research fundamentally re-evaluates the function of India’s sovereign debt (G-Secs) and the RBI’s liquidity management. The model implies that the Ministry of Finance and the RBI must consider the distributional consequences of public debt issuance, as expanding the supply of G-Secs acts as an active, non-transfer fiscal lever to slow the concentration of wealth among the entrepreneurial class and manage risk-taking across the economy. This reframes debt management from a purely fiscal stability task to an important tool for mitigating structural wealth inequality.
Follow the full news here: Asset prices, wealth inequality, and welfare: safe assets as a solution